state-of-mayflower-v-adolobee

Mayflower District Court

#state-of-mayflower-v-adolobee

This is the start of #state-of-mayflower-v-adolobee channel.

shah 2025-01-27 09:41 a.m.

https://trello.com/c/MoNAfA5h/484-state-of-mayflower-v-adolobee

CASE INFORMATION**

IN THE MAYFLOWER DISTRICT COURT FOR CLARK COUNTY

---

CR-0059-25 State of Mayflower v. Defendant

Trial Type: Criminal

Judge Assigned: Hon. Judge Wellesley

---

CHARGES**

```
‌1 M.S.C. § 1302 (Gross Misconduct) ON one count.
1 M.S.C. § 2303 (Aggravated Battery) ON one count.
2 M.S.C. § 1213 (Felony R...

Labels

Criminal

shah 2025-01-27 09:41 a.m.

## CR-0059-25 State of Mayflower v. Adolobee

shah 2025-01-27 09:41 a.m.

@Kezzera

shah pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 08:40 p.m.

Kezzera 2025-01-27 11:17 a.m.

Hello please send message here

Kezzera 2025-01-27 11:17 a.m.

@Krispy Chicken Tender

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-27 11:18 a.m.

Kezzera 2025-01-27 11:20 a.m.

Hello state attorney

Kezzera 2025-01-27 11:25 a.m.

I'll have a read of the affidavit

Kezzera 2025-01-27 11:25 a.m.

I'll determine and decide if there is a pc for summons(edited)

Kezzera 2025-01-27 11:54 a.m.

@Krispy Chicken Tender

I will find that there is probable cause and accordingly require the defendant to be summoned

Kezzera 2025-01-27 11:55 a.m.

I want to run by with you whether I should consider any conditions to impose on the defendant

Kezzera 2025-01-27 11:55 a.m.

such as a firearms restriction, driving restriction, etc.

Kezzera 2025-01-27 11:58 a.m.

notwithstanding the statutory barring of his employment, which is imposed on him for the duration of these proceedings 4 msc 5 § 1601(edited)

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-27 11:58 a.m.

Driving restriction primarily, i’ll draft summons later today

Kezzera 2025-01-27 11:58 a.m.

I will require you to prepare one for signing then

Kezzera

@Krispy Chicken Tender I will find that there is probable cause and accordingly require the defendant to be summoned

Kezzera 2025-01-27 11:59 a.m.

@honkhonk

PC determined, please enter into trello as comment thanks(edited)

Kezzera 2025-01-27 01:37 p.m.

@Krispy Chicken Tender

I will find that restrictions are necessary to impose against the defendant as a part of his case

Kezzera 2025-01-27 01:37 p.m.

Once the defendant is present I will read out that condition to him and have him sign an affidavit promising not to drive any vehicle(edited)

Kezzera 2025-01-27 01:37 p.m.

and enter an order relating to the restriction

Kezzera 2025-01-27 01:54 p.m.

@Krispy Chicken Tender

and to the defendant, @Toby will preside over the pre-trial proceedings after I impose the conditions and confirm his presence here

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-27 04:17 p.m.

cc: @Toby

@Kezzera

(edited)

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-27 04:18 p.m.

If you would, a signture too please

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-27 04:34 p.m.

cc: @Kezzera(edited)

Krispy Chicken Tender

cc: @Toby

@Kezzera

(edited)

Toby 2025-01-27 06:03 p.m.

Please affix my signature

Toby

Please affix my signature

Kezzera 2025-01-27 06:04 p.m.

@Krispy Chicken Tender

will allow magistrate's signature to be fixed on the summons

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-27 06:04 p.m.

Ok, i'll make a new copy with such

Kezzera 2025-01-27 06:05 p.m.

sorry for hassle

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-27 06:07 p.m.

Toby used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-01-27 06:08 p.m.

Case Modified

@Toby

has added @Honoripedia to the case channel.

Toby 2025-01-27 06:08 p.m.

@Honoripedia

Hi, please serve, I approve of this summons order

User

Message could not be loaded.

Kezzera 2025-01-27 06:09 p.m.

i will ask this be withheld for your own security

Kezzera 2025-01-27 06:11 p.m.

let it reflect on the record ex parte communication took place between @Krispy Chicken Tender and @Toby on the following: magistrate's release of his signature to affix to summons. withheld by my direction to prevent theft of identity

Toby

@Honoripedia Hi, please serve, I approve of this summons order

Honoripedia 2025-01-27 06:49 p.m.

Hi i’m on mobile and for the 50th time myself nor almost with common sense downloads PDF.

Honoripedia 2025-01-27 06:49 p.m.

Either send as link so I can send it or ask someone who’s able to sell it.

Kezzera 2025-01-27 08:49 p.m.

@Toby

Toby 2025-01-28 03:30 a.m.

It's not difficult to download it but whatever. @Krispy Chicken Tender supply a linked version please

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-28 04:04 a.m.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cKPK6hFiKfhdCEU8x2L0nNb1zqcWlmlZ/view?usp=sharing

SUMMONS ORDER(sig) - State v. Adolobee.pdf

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-28 04:04 a.m.

cc: @Honoripedia

Kezzera 2025-01-29 03:39 p.m.

@impactiii

Hello

Kezzera 2025-01-29 03:39 p.m.

Received your filings

Kezzera 2025-01-29 03:39 p.m.

You can converse here as well

impactiii 2025-01-29 03:39 p.m.

Kezzera 2025-01-29 03:40 p.m.

@Krispy Chicken Tender

Take notice of an MTD filed which Defendant's counsel has attached here directly for your benefit

impactiii 2025-01-29 03:40 p.m.

My favorite state attorney

impactiii 2025-01-29 03:40 p.m.

Is this peak?

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-29 03:46 p.m.

Oh my god

Krispy Chicken Tender

Oh my god

impactiii 2025-01-29 03:48 p.m.

Sir where is ONLYTWENTYCHARACTERS

impactiii 2025-01-29 03:48 p.m.

You are not the State Attorney

impactiii

Sir where is ONLYTWENTYCHARACTERS

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-29 03:49 p.m.

Assimilated

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-29 03:51 p.m.

Wait but it is signed

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-29 03:54 p.m.

I’ll review the submissions when I’m back

impactiii 2025-01-29 03:54 p.m.

This is what I'm looking at

Kezzera 2025-01-29 03:54 p.m.

That's what we have too yes

Kezzera 2025-01-29 03:55 p.m.

So this is very confusing

impactiii 2025-01-29 03:55 p.m.

Kezzera

So this is very confusing

impactiii 2025-01-29 03:55 p.m.

He might have the work product

impactiii 2025-01-29 03:55 p.m.

That says drive and it looks like google drive

impactiii 2025-01-29 03:56 p.m.

Not mobile PDF viewer

Kezzera 2025-01-29 03:56 p.m.

It is probable

Kezzera 2025-01-29 03:56 p.m.

We can have Temdie confirm the discrepancies though

Kezzera 2025-01-29 03:56 p.m.

I've had a second look and identified this indeed is the case

Kezzera 2025-01-29 03:56 p.m.

with the boiler template sign field

Kezzera 2025-01-29 03:57 p.m.

(I have not made any comment as to any other issues raised and will reserve it pending a formal response to your motion)

impactiii 2025-01-29 03:58 p.m.

If it actually was signed then it can just be dismissed as moot

impactiii 2025-01-29 03:58 p.m.

But that's still not what I see

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:00 p.m.

What about your issue regarding the affiant?

Kezzera

What about your issue regarding the affiant?

impactiii 2025-01-29 04:01 p.m.

I'll let you decide

impactiii 2025-01-29 04:01 p.m.

I don't have time to take this case so whatever the result is

impactiii 2025-01-29 04:01 p.m.

I'm pulling out after

impactiii 2025-01-29 04:01 p.m.

Limited appearance

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:03 p.m.

I am aware, your appearance is appreciated Mr. sado

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-29 04:05 p.m.

So apparently what happened was the investigator copied the document instead of editing the preexisting one after I requested a change to the charges, below is the original AOPC

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1njtJyDf78szCdq7Ojy4wqJldQx_4N29A/view?usp=sharing

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-29 04:06 p.m.

and never requested another signature from jaro, who evidently at the time had resigned from the doj

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:07 p.m.

I do not believe this still addresses the other outstanding issue raised in the MTD

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:07 p.m.

I would normally cancel the summons entirely and reset this case back to its original start but the matter of the affiant must be addressed

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:08 p.m.

and will expect a formal response from you, I'm afraid

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-29 04:08 p.m.

I agree, the state would like to request a refiling of the aopc and ci

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:08 p.m.

What about the affiant issue? Are you not going to respond to that?(edited)

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:08 p.m.

Here I'll just

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:09 p.m.

Take your time, read the MTD if you haven't

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:09 p.m.

then you can tell me what you intend to do, and I will expect that

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:10 p.m.

You are very likely going to have to make formal submissions because it is asking to have this dismissed in its entirety as well

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-29 04:10 p.m.

I'll send a document by tmr or tonight

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:10 p.m.

OK, thanks SA

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:11 p.m.

@Toby

for your benefit, cc

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:26 p.m.

I misunderstood the original issue raised in the MTD

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:27 p.m.

Several remedies are available for the state to suggest in regards to this issue(edited)

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:27 p.m.

and obviously the option of dismissing is also available, up to w/ prej for the defendant, or other remedies if they wish to suggest later (given it is permitted)(edited)

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:28 p.m.

Regardless, I will expect a formal response as it is required per the criminal procedure rules and of this court in particular(edited)

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:29 p.m.

I have now properly understood and acknowledged the situation as it stands

Kezzera

Several remedies are available for the state to suggest in regards to this issue(edited)

impactiii 2025-01-29 04:32 p.m.

Albrecht v. United States

, 273 U.S. 1, 11 n.10 (1927) (“In United States v. Shepard, Fed. Cas. No. 16,273, and United States v. Wells, 225 F. 320, the court quashed informations because of the illegality of the arrest [or summons]” based on the invalidity of the original affidavit.)

Krispy Chicken Tender

So apparently what happened was the investigator copied the document instead of editing the preexisting one after I requested a change to the charges, below is the original AOPC h...

impactiii 2025-01-29 04:33 p.m.

And thankfully we objected before the amendment (is this an amendment?) was made

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:33 p.m.

@Krispy Chicken Tender

You have until: Friday, January 31, 2025 at 4:33 p.m. to submit a response to the MTD(edited)

impactiii

And thankfully we objected before the amendment (is this an amendment?) was made

impactiii 2025-01-29 04:34 p.m.

Albrecht v. United States, 273 U.S. 1, 10 (1927) (“By failing to move to quash the warrant before the defect had been cured, the defendants lost their right to object.”)

Thankfully we avoided that

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:34 p.m.

Acknowledged, but I'd still require the response before making any decision

Kezzera 2025-01-29 04:37 p.m.

I will allow, until the deadline, for the state to respond, then we can decide what to do from there(edited)

Toby used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-01-30 08:28 a.m.

Case Modified

@Toby

has added @aklah. to the case channel.

Toby 2025-01-30 08:28 a.m.

@aklah.

Welcome

Kezzera 2025-01-30 06:13 p.m.

For the record, defendant is now present in these proceedings

aklah. 2025-01-30 07:38 p.m.

Hello, thank you for having me your honor

Kezzera 2025-01-30 08:50 p.m.

Hello Adolobee, thank you for appearing

Kezzera 2025-01-30 08:50 p.m.

For the time being we are waiting on the state to respond to the MTD

Kezzera 2025-01-30 08:50 p.m.

We will determine how to move forward after its submission

Kezzera pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 08:40 p.m.

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-31 03:01 a.m.

cc: @Kezzera

@aklah.

@impactiii

Kezzera 2025-01-31 05:39 a.m.

As a reminder please provide this in filing-center

Kezzera 2025-01-31 05:39 a.m.

I will accept this filing

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-31 05:48 p.m.

i'll upload it to the webstie

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-01-31 05:50 p.m.

Or it could just not work
https://prnt.sc/KK_agKZzys4v

Screenshot

Captured with Lightshot

Kezzera 2025-01-31 05:54 p.m.

No, don't

Kezzera 2025-01-31 05:54 p.m.

This case is entirely sorted on Trello

Kezzera 2025-01-31 05:54 p.m.

also I'm taking issue with two cases you've cited

Kezzera 2025-01-31 05:54 p.m.

I've taken the liberty to consult with colleagues and our staff attorney who has access to databases

Kezzera 2025-01-31 05:55 p.m.

to find this case called: United States
v. Mechanics Bank, 159 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 1998)

impactiii 2025-01-31 05:55 p.m.

@Kezzera

Your Honor, pursuant to an Order to Show Cause made against this counseil in state-of-mayflower-v-inciples for suspected use of generative content -

impactiii 2025-01-31 05:55 p.m.

I was actually about to say that LOL

impactiii 2025-01-31 05:55 p.m.

United States v. Mechanics Bank, 159 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 1998)

impactiii

@Kezzera Your Honor, pursuant to an Order to Show Cause made against this counseil in state-of-mayflower-v-inciples for suspected use of generative content -

Kezzera 2025-01-31 05:55 p.m.

Is this attorney also in inciples

impactiii 2025-01-31 05:55 p.m.

Yes

Kezzera 2025-01-31 05:55 p.m.

or did you cite the wrong case

Kezzera 2025-01-31 05:55 p.m.

oh, is there an OSC?

impactiii 2025-01-31 05:55 p.m.

Yes

Kezzera 2025-01-31 05:56 p.m.

I see

Kezzera 2025-01-31 05:56 p.m.

I have identified so

impactiii 2025-01-31 05:56 p.m.

I cannot locate that case on Casetext

Kezzera 2025-01-31 05:57 p.m.

I can't either

Kezzera 2025-01-31 05:57 p.m.

We're waiting on a result back from the Lexis database

Kezzera 2025-01-31 05:57 p.m.

Further

Kezzera 2025-01-31 05:57 p.m.

"U.S. v. One Parcel of Property, 963 F.2d 1496 (11th Cir. 1992) (sustaining
that form defects such as lack of signatures don't necessarily invalidate an
affidavit, assuming its substantive matter is sound and correctable)"

Kezzera 2025-01-31 05:57 p.m.

I've read this particular case as well since it hits at the issue pretty directly

Kezzera 2025-01-31 05:58 p.m.

and I don't think I have seen anything that would support this summary

Kezzera 2025-01-31 05:58 p.m.

or any part of it supporting this summary

Kezzera 2025-01-31 06:01 p.m.

I'm very confused

Kezzera 2025-01-31 06:01 p.m.

Right, OK

Kezzera 2025-01-31 06:01 p.m.

We're changing direction

Kezzera 2025-01-31 06:01 p.m.

For something that would be routine and simple to address, it's now gotten pretty complicated

impactiii

@Kezzera Your Honor, pursuant to an Order to Show Cause made against this counseil in state-of-mayflower-v-inciples for suspected use of generative content -

Kezzera 2025-01-31 06:03 p.m.

I intend to make an order of the same

Kezzera 2025-01-31 06:03 p.m.

I am suspecting AIG usage, and I want to be sure that it is not the case

Kezzera 2025-01-31 07:14 p.m.

@impactiii

@Krispy Chicken Tender

I have entered an order, with comments on the situation, requiring that the State Attorney Chickem_Temdie provide and furnish the two cases, simply known as One Parcel of Property (Real Estate, actually) and Mechanics Bank, with the exact citations as provided in the response to MTD (known as ECF 6), and provide the EXACT STATEMENTS OR QUOTATIONS supporting the points in section II, paragraphs A1 and D1 in the response to MTD.

Kezzera 2025-01-31 07:15 p.m.

Excerpt from the paper order:

Kezzera 2025-01-31 07:15 p.m.

IT IS ORDERED that state’s counsel, Staff Attorney Chickem_Temdie, be required to
make a written submission to this court, and within it: (A) make available and append copies of
the full judicial opinions/decisions for the following cases: United States v. One Parcel of
Property, 963 F.2d 1496 (11th Cir. 1992); and United States v. Mechanics Bank, 159 F.3d 1182
(9th Cir. 1998), and (B) reference the exact quote that supports the position of the state at section
II, paragraphs A1 and D1 in their response to the defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF 6).
Page 4 of 2
In Lander, Mayflower, this 31st day of January 2025.

/s/Albert
Chief Judge of the District Court in Clark County

Kezzera 2025-01-31 07:16 p.m.

The paper order is available on the trello card, and is the latest filing.(edited)

Kezzera 2025-01-31 07:18 p.m.

There was a slight error to the court order as it revealed pre-written conditions imposed on the defendant - those are not released and do not constitute the order in any way (obviously).(edited)

Kezzera 2025-01-31 07:18 p.m.

It has now been corrected.

Toby used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-01-31 07:48 p.m.

Case Modified

@Toby

has added @Reapers to the case channel.

Toby 2025-01-31 07:49 p.m.

Hello @Reapers, let the record reflect that Mr. Reaper is appearing on behalf of the State and has filed a Notice of Appearance

Toby 2025-01-31 08:00 p.m.

@Reapers

just for clarity, are you replacing chicken as primary counsel for the State, or are you co-counsel?

Toby

@Reapers just for clarity, are you replacing chicken as primary counsel for the State, or are you co-counsel?

Reapers 2025-01-31 08:08 p.m.

I will be replacing mr. Chicken as primary counsel and he will remain a co-counsel on this

Toby 2025-01-31 08:09 p.m.

Very well.
CC: @Kezzera

Kezzera

``` IT IS ORDERED that state’s counsel, Staff Attorney Chickem_Temdie, be required to make a written submission to this court, and within it: (A) make available and append copies o...

Reapers 2025-01-31 08:09 p.m.

I will be submitting a response to this shortly, your honor

Kezzera 2025-01-31 09:20 p.m.

I can't accept that

Kezzera 2025-01-31 09:21 p.m.

I require Chickem_Temdie to submit this as I have ordered him and him only

Kezzera 2025-01-31 09:21 p.m.

Unless he supplies this to you and he swears on affidavit that it is him who sourced it, then you can submit it on his behalf

Kezzera

Unless he supplies this to you and he swears on affidavit that it is him who sourced it, then you can submit it on his behalf

Kezzera 2025-01-31 09:22 p.m.

I'm not allowing anything deviating from the original order or this

Kezzera 2025-01-31 09:24 p.m.

Compliance with or an admission of them not existing are possible responses

Reapers 2025-01-31 09:31 p.m.

Very well, he will be drafting a response and submitting it within a day

Kezzera 2025-01-31 10:01 p.m.

Ok, thanks

Kezzera

Ok, thanks

Reapers 2025-02-01 10:44 a.m.

Since Mr. Chickem no longer works at the DoJ, I don't believe a response or order will be necessary anymore, your honor

Kezzera 2025-02-01 10:47 a.m.

No, I don't agree

Kezzera 2025-02-01 10:48 a.m.

He is still a practicing attorney. This issue is not strictly confined to his conduct as a prosecutor.(edited)

Kezzera 2025-02-01 10:48 a.m.

When did he resign? @Reapers

Kezzera

When did he resign? @Reapers

Reapers 2025-02-01 10:50 a.m.

He was discharged by the Attorney General a few hours ago

Kezzera 2025-02-01 10:50 a.m.

So he was fired/terminated then?

Reapers 2025-02-01 10:50 a.m.

The Department of Justice would rather not speak on the circumstances of the discharge publicly, your honor

Kezzera 2025-02-01 10:51 a.m.

You can't clarify if he was fired?

Kezzera 2025-02-01 10:51 a.m.

Fine, but I cannot release him from this particular issue since it is not strictly in relation to his conduct as a prosecutor

Kezzera 2025-02-01 10:51 a.m.

This hits at ethics and professional conduct(edited)

Kezzera 2025-02-01 10:52 a.m.

It would be inappropriate - why should I release him from this issue?

Reapers 2025-02-01 10:52 a.m.

Well, can the state still proceed with the replies for the motions presented since he no longer represents the state(edited)

Kezzera 2025-02-01 10:52 a.m.

No. I've entered these filings when they were submitted and the deadlines have passed.

Kezzera 2025-02-01 10:54 a.m.

Why should I allow the state to cancel its own submissions and re-submit past the deadline imposed?(edited)

Kezzera 2025-02-01 10:54 a.m.

Would that not be unfair to the defendants?(edited)

Reapers 2025-02-01 10:56 a.m.

It's unfair to the people of Mayflower for the way they have been represented here, we ask for the chance to remedy this situation

Kezzera 2025-02-01 10:56 a.m.

What legal basis can you provide me to support that?

Kezzera 2025-02-01 10:57 a.m.

Am I required to allow that? Is it my complete discretion to give you that leave - if it's my discretion, what do you have to support your request to resubmit?

Kezzera 2025-02-01 10:58 a.m.

Without the submissions of the defendant to your particular request I can't even begin to consider it(edited)

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:02 a.m.

I appreciate you having to make attempts to correct the situation counsellor, but I am not sure if you have recourse - this is just me being ignorant, thus(edited)

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:02 a.m.

I would strongly appreciate something to support your request

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:02 a.m.

I am still bound to have Chickem subject to my order producing those opinions - for his benefit I have not imposed a deadline as you stated earlier he intends to submit within a day of that order being published(edited)

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:03 a.m.

Since he is now gone, can you speak to his promise that he will submit within a day still or should I ask him explicitly to confirm?

Reapers 2025-02-01 11:05 a.m.

United States v. Stoltenberg, 3:18-CR-00109-TMB-MMS "A defendant must prove actual prejudice if they seek a dismissal of an indictment due to prosecutorial misconduct."

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:06 a.m.

How is this relevant to your request?

Reapers 2025-02-01 11:06 a.m.

If the defendant has not suffered any prejudice, this case should not be dismissed because of Chickem's misconduct and the state should be given the chance to respond, your honor

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:06 a.m.

But the state has responded to the motion to dismiss, this is an official representation given by the state

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:07 a.m.

By what authority can the state now decide to rescind its submission, even unilaterally, and be permitted to re-submit, past the deadline which is mandated by the rules of this court?

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:07 a.m.

Key: the deadline

Reapers 2025-02-01 11:08 a.m.

These responses by Chickem were prosecutorial misconduct, we argue that if the case is dismissed because of the responses he submitted, then the outcome could be a dismissal because of prosecutorial misconduct

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:09 a.m.

Yes that could very much likely happen

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:09 a.m.

Or it may not

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:10 a.m.

But why would that be the reason for you to re-submit?

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:10 a.m.

Was chickem, at the time, not representing the state?

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:13 a.m.

Is there anything to suggest that the prosecutorial misconduct, or prosecutorial x, or some other ill-act of the state, is something that can be remedied without prejudicing the defendant in any way?(edited)

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:13 a.m.

Is the act harmless?

Reapers 2025-02-01 11:13 a.m.

Because of the accusations against him on using GAI to write these motions, he has potentially violated the duty placed upon him by the State Bar's rules of professional conduct to represent the State in a competent manner

Reapers 2025-02-01 11:14 a.m.

Therefore, if anyone has been prejudiced here, it would be the state not the defendant

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:14 a.m.

Okay, but these are accusations are still being looked into, no official sanctions so far - a presumption of innocence remains

Reapers 2025-02-01 11:15 a.m.

An official sanction has been made, your honor, it's why Chickem is longer with us at the department

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:15 a.m.

What do you mean?

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:15 a.m.

Clarify this please

Reapers 2025-02-01 11:15 a.m.

I mean it was not a voluntary discharge

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:15 a.m.

I'm stopping you from saying anything further

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:16 a.m.

since I'm afraid you are accidentally going to reveal the nature of his departure from the DOJ

Reapers 2025-02-01 11:16 a.m.

This is what I was trying to avoid, your honor

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:16 a.m.

Provide me a written motion for your request, just like anyone else would

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:16 a.m.

I'm still proceeding with the matter on Chickem

impactiii 2025-02-01 11:17 a.m.

We will oppose any motion for leave to file any additional reply. @Kezzera

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:17 a.m.

Thank you for the clarifying your intentions counsellor @impactiii(edited)

Kezzera

Provide me a written motion for your request, just like anyone else would

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:19 a.m.

@Reapers

For your benefit (on process)

Reapers 2025-02-01 11:20 a.m.

It will be done

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:27 a.m.

Thank you

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:27 a.m.

@Krispy Chicken Tender

You are still subject to the order I gave. Please confirm whether you intend to submit within the day.

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:28 a.m.

If you don't by tomorrow 11am GMT I will set a deadline separately

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:29 a.m.

Sunday, February 2, 2025 at 6:00 a.m.

- this is tomorrow, 11am gmt converted to your local time(edited)

Kezzera

@Krispy Chicken Tender You are still subject to the order I gave. Please confirm whether you intend to submit within the day.

Reapers 2025-02-01 11:30 a.m.

He's already been held in contempt for this matter and this case was used as evidence for it I believe

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:32 a.m.

In the Inciples case?

Kezzera

In the Inciples case?

Reapers 2025-02-01 11:32 a.m.

Yes

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:32 a.m.

@actxrz

You can chat here

actxrz 2025-02-01 11:33 a.m.

Reapers

Yes

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:33 a.m.

I'll look shortly

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:33 a.m.

hey

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:33 a.m.

I think you're aware what's going on

actxrz 2025-02-01 11:33 a.m.

I am :/

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:33 a.m.

Will I expect a motion for permission to file any additional submissions replies etc

Kezzera 2025-02-01 11:33 a.m.

or do you intend to do something else?

Kezzera

@Krispy Chicken Tender You are still subject to the order I gave. Please confirm whether you intend to submit within the day.

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-02-01 12:00 p.m.

Yea I’ll include it with the same requirement awesome asked

Kezzera 2025-02-01 12:01 p.m.

ok, thanks

Kezzera

Provide me a written motion for your request, just like anyone else would

Reapers 2025-02-01 01:57 p.m.

Kezzera 2025-02-01 02:59 p.m.

Thanks

Kezzera 2025-02-01 02:59 p.m.

@impactiii

Kezzera

@impactiii ^

impactiii 2025-02-01 03:00 p.m.

Typing up a response now

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-02-01 03:08 p.m.

cc: @Kezzera

impactiii 2025-02-01 04:07 p.m.

MR. ADOLOBEE’S OPPOSITION TO THE STATE’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO “RE-RESPOND” TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS

CC: @Krispy Chicken Tender @Reapers @Kezzera

impactiii

MR. ADOLOBEE’S OPPOSITION TO THE STATE’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO “RE-RESPOND” TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS CC: @Krispy Chicken Tender

@Reapers

@Kezzera

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-02-01 04:08 p.m.

I'm not supposed to be cc'd

Kezzera 2025-02-01 04:12 p.m.

Both are filed and now under consideration

Kezzera 2025-02-01 04:12 p.m.

Temdie's response to the order has been filed and now under consideration

Reapers

Click to see attachment.

impactiii 2025-02-01 04:15 p.m.

Also, in light of admittances made by the State in this motion, I am continuing my limited appearance and notifying the Court of my intention to file a second motion to dismiss. @Kezzera

Kezzera 2025-02-01 04:22 p.m.

Thanks for clarifying your intention

Reapers 2025-02-01 04:29 p.m.

Can you also clarify the intentions of your limited appearance and disclose which proceedings you’re here for

impactiii 2025-02-01 04:39 p.m.

My limited appearance notice doesn't specify a limitation but I was originally only here to file that first MTD. I'm not trial counsel.

impactiii 2025-02-01 04:40 p.m.

@Kezzera

Will you have a ruling on the MTD and the motion for leave soon?

Kezzera 2025-02-01 04:41 p.m.

To the first MTD?(edited)

Kezzera 2025-02-01 04:41 p.m.

and yes to the motion to leave

Kezzera

To the first MTD?(edited)

impactiii 2025-02-01 04:43 p.m.

To both

Kezzera 2025-02-01 05:01 p.m.

Yes

Kezzera

Yes

impactiii 2025-02-01 09:16 p.m.

What time do you think the rulings will be sent in?

Kezzera 2025-02-01 10:14 p.m.

For everything within a couple of days

Kezzera 2025-02-01 10:15 p.m.

Is there any particular reason you're asking?

Kezzera

Is there any particular reason you're asking?

impactiii 2025-02-01 10:28 p.m.

Just curious

impactiii 2025-02-02 07:19 p.m.

@Kezzera

Any updates?

Kezzera 2025-02-02 07:38 p.m.

An order to show cause is entered against @Krispy Chicken Tender . The order should be read in full by Mr. Temdie - separate proceedings begin there

Kezzera 2025-02-02 07:38 p.m.

Decision still being prepared for MTL and MTD

Kezzera

An order to show cause is entered against @Krispy Chicken Tender . The order should be read in full by Mr. Temdie - separate proceedings begin there

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-02-02 07:54 p.m.

Your honor, to show cause for?

Kezzera 2025-02-02 08:18 p.m.

please read the order

Krispy Chicken Tender

cc: @Kezzera

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-02-02 08:39 p.m.

Your honor, do you mean this one I sent yesterday?

Kezzera 2025-02-02 08:49 p.m.

if you check the trello, ive attached a show cause order

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-02-02 09:08 p.m.

I would like to nominate my choice of counsel for this matter your honor.
cc: @polyrabies

Kezzera

if you check the trello, ive attached a show cause order

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-02-02 11:10 p.m.

Kezzera

An order to show cause is entered against @Krispy Chicken Tender . The order should be read in full by Mr. Temdie - separate proceedings begin there

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-02-03 12:36 a.m.

Your honor, is this a contempt hearing? If so what kind is it?

Kezzera 2025-02-03 12:48 a.m.

Other sanctions

Kezzera 2025-02-03 12:48 a.m.

It's commonly used for contempt

Kezzera

It's commonly used for contempt

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-02-03 12:51 a.m.

Specification, your honor?(edited)

Krispy Chicken Tender 2025-02-03 12:52 a.m.

So it's not a contempt hearing, but sanctions are commonly used for contempt?

impactiii 2025-02-03 12:09 p.m.

@Kezzera

At this point, based the derailment of this case as a result of what the State itself has classified as "prosecutorial misconduct" in their motion for leave, I'm going to ask for dismissal without prejudice. We've detracted from this far too long to deal with punishing the former prosecutor and we have lost numerous hours of time that could've been spent on actual pretrial matters instead.

impactiii 2025-02-03 12:10 p.m.

And despite what the State says about this theory of "reverse prejudice," it is their job to competently prosecute this case; it is not the defendant's job to sit here and make sure that the State doesn't "prejudice" itself because it manufactured case law in it's filings.

Reapers 2025-02-03 12:33 p.m.

The state does not object to a dismissal without prejudice

Kezzera 2025-02-03 01:29 p.m.

I was in the middle of writing my responses to these motions above but since there seems to be no challenges to dismissal at this rate this will significantly influence proceedings

Kezzera 2025-02-03 01:29 p.m.

Saves us all time

Kezzera 2025-02-03 01:30 p.m.

Personal emergency arose, expect a few hours delay in addition to the anticipated timeframe I stated previous

actxrz 2025-02-09 05:57 p.m.

VERBAL NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS COUNSEL OF RECORD

COMES NOW, actxrz, Assistant Attorney General of the Special Proceedings Division, Mayflower Department of Justice, and hereby provides notice to the Court and all parties that I am entering my appearance as prosecuting counsel of record in this matter, replacing MixedReaper, who has been removed from this case.

Respectfully submitted,

actxrz

Assistant Attorney General
Special Proceedings Division
Mayflower Department of Justice
572 Main St., NW., Rm. 2101
Lander, MF 11023
actxrz@mdoj.gov

actxrz 2025-02-09 05:58 p.m.

cc; @Kezzera

@Toby

@impactiii

impactiii 2025-02-12 03:18 p.m.

@Kezzera

Can you dismiss this case

Reapers

The state does not object to a dismissal without prejudice

Toby 2025-02-12 04:46 p.m.

@actxrz

does the state still hold this position?

actxrz 2025-02-12 08:40 p.m.

yes, the state does not object to a dismissal without prejudice

impactiii 2025-02-12 08:54 p.m.

@actxrz

Put it on god

actxrz

yes, the state does not object to a dismissal without prejudice

Toby 2025-02-12 09:03 p.m.

Perfect, in that case, @Kezzera are you all good with me dismissing this case without prejudice?

impactiii

@actxrz Put it on god

actxrz 2025-02-12 09:07 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/blessed-birthday-gif-7600127017028669877

impactiii 2025-02-12 09:16 p.m.

PAPERLESS ORDER:

This case is dismissed with prejudice.

CC: @actxrz

@impactiii

@Toby

@Kezzera

impactiii

PAPERLESS ORDER: This case is dismissed with prejudice. CC: @actxrz

@impactiii

@Toby

@Kezzera

impactiii 2025-02-12 09:16 p.m.

Just copy and paste ts shit @Toby

impactiii 2025-02-12 09:16 p.m.

Copy and paste ts shit b4 u pmo

impactiii 2025-02-12 09:16 p.m.

@Toby

actxrz 2025-02-12 09:17 p.m.

DUde what the heck

actxrz 2025-02-12 09:17 p.m.

I think u forgot the out in withOUT hahah!

impactiii 2025-02-12 09:17 p.m.

Ohhhhhhhhhh

impactiii 2025-02-12 09:17 p.m.

Haha.

impactiii 2025-02-12 09:17 p.m.

@Toby

I’m the alpha

impactiii 2025-02-12 09:17 p.m.

Do what alpha says

actxrz 2025-02-12 09:21 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/kawaii-infiuenzas-longtermed-meme-iongtermed-gif-17893439857218807184